19 August 2014

Familiar Dirges: Hope in Milton's Poetry of Death



In  England of the seventeenth century, an England which lived under the perennial shadow of mortality, Death is probably the single-most important event that dominated human life. Death of a person was, at once, a cognitive, personal experience and a community experience. Milton, having being exposed to death from very close quarters, was fascinated with the void that Death left behind, and obsessively wrote about it in an attempt to come to terms with its levelling effect. As yet indeterminate in his religious stance, the young Milton often used Death as the primary motif of his early poetry. Milton variously treats Death as a pestilence, a judgement upon humanity, a cruel, cold hand that sounds an infant's death rattle, and even as an old friend. In all his poetic expressions related to Death, however, one thing stands out- his formalization of the act of Death, whether private or public. Milton's ability to adapt a formal structure to express any emotion, no matter how poignant and personal, is one of the pillars on which his fame rests. Milton's poetry of Death, too, is characterized by the embedding of intensely personal meditations in the trappings of particular rigid formal structures.

Milton’s first published poem was 'An Epitaph on the Admirable Dramatic Poet, W. Shakespeare', a sonnet that was printed anonymously in the second folio of Shakespeare’s works. Although a poem which is more about poetic reputation than death, it does talk about ceremonialisation of death. Through the poem, Milton pays homage to the deceased poet by talking about how Shakespeare has built his own monument through his works, which are read and treasured, many years after his death, thus negating the need for a physical monument to commemorate the death of the revered poet. The ritualisation of death can be noted through the use of certain words like ‘sepulchre’ and ‘tomb’, which eventually tie up with the greater idea of creating a monument with words, for someone who was known for his words.

In the spring of 1626, Milton wrote ‘On the Death of a Fair Infant’, commemorating and mourning the loss of his niece, the daughter of his older sister. It contains themes that can be found throughout the Miltonian corpus. The stanzaic groupings of the funeral ode, usage of classical allusions and theological references-again, a formalized structure-serve to emphasize the fact that death leaves an indelible mark that one cannot do away with. This poem was also written during a time when the mortality rate was extremely high amongst the residents of London. People were dying of the plague, and nobody had the time to mourn the death of an infant. Milton talks about the then dead child, who came into the world to grace everyone with her presence, but moved on to the higher realm since this world was incompatible with her existence. On the other hand, an infant also stood for ideas of hope, and the death of one meant the destruction of hope. Writing about these deaths thus became a kind of reminder of death, of the transience of life, and at the same time, a reminder of the life that once existed. Like the previously discussed poem, this personal memento mori also has a highly formalized structure. According to Lewalski, the poem “finds its chief models in Spenserian poets like the Fletchers, in neo-Latin funeral epigrams on the death of children for the use of the flower motif, and in Pindaric odes for the myths and mythic transformations. The seven-line stanzas meld Chaucerian rime royal with the Spenserian stanza, retaining the Spenserian final alexandrine as well as Spenserian archaisms and schemes of alliteration and assonance.” 

“An Epitaph on the Marchioness of Winchester” is perhaps a better example of Milton’s engagement with form while describing death. In this poem, he talks about the death of Jane Paulet, the twenty-three year old Marchioness of Winchester, who died while giving birth to her son, who also passed away. Written shortly after Paulet’s death, the poem is an ode in iambic tetrameter. He deliberately chooses a form that would allow him to praise his subject and her virtues, as is done on a tombstone, by conforming to tradition, introducing the subject and consequently announcing her age and her stature in the society.  He talks about the latter, mentioning that she was not only the wife of John Paulet, the 5th Marquess of Winchester, but also “A viscount’s daughter” and an “Earl’s heir”, both of which is cited as reason for her virtue. He selects this method of praising his subject quite wittily, reiterating Aristotle’s statement that genealogy is “the fundamental ground of reputation or discredit for human beings.” The movement of the poem is from past to present, from dark to light, and a kind of hopefulness springs from this. This hopefulness is a constant feature of Milton's musings on Death. The Marchioness, initially, is referred to in third person, and the emphasis is upon the tragedy of her early death. However, post the forty sixth line, she is addressed directly, and as a result of this, the tone changes as the poem moves from past to present, talking about her present happy state. In this there is the ever-present hope of the redemptive capacity of even Death.  The Marchioness lives on, happy in the ever-living beauty of the poet's world, which is a Deathless world of light and shadow both. Throughout the poem, apart from adorning it with classical allusions, Milton uses octo- and heptasyllabic couplets, which have traditionally been used in English literature to create light effects, but, as shown by Jonson, can also be used while addressing serious issues. Thus, by employing a structured approach towards an intensely personal experience, Milton, yet again, creates a stateliness that only reinforces the strength of the emotions he attempts to convey. 

Form and emotion intertwine in Milton's early poetry as it does later. The short poems evoke powerful reactions in both contemporaries and later readers. Yet the formal structures he employs follow the rules, more or less, of the convention it belongs to. This conventional expression results, as it does with any truly great poet, not in creating something rigid and static, but a dynamic creation, that appeals differently to different readers, something timeless in its universal crystallization of Death into poetry. The shadow of the Day of Judgement always looms on those that Death claims, but there is always a hope of redemption, always a respite from the blow of Death. Death, in effect, is never final. We feel, like Milton does, that “Hobson has supped, and's newly gone to bed", and feel comforted as if he were soon to wake again.

-Disha Raychaudhuri
PG-I
Roll No. 33

No comments:

Post a Comment